| 周鹏生△ 焦锋马春花.材料性质和专业对解决四卡片问题影响的眼动研究[J].,2011,11(2):361-364 |
| 材料性质和专业对解决四卡片问题影响的眼动研究 |
| Influence of data category and specialty on the Four-card Problem:an Eye-Movement Study |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 材料性质 四卡片问题 条件句 眼动研究 |
| 英文关键词: Data category Four-card problem Conditional sentence Study on eye movement |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 535 |
| 全文下载次数: 877 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：探讨实验材料性质和专业背景等因素对四卡片推理问题解决的影响。方法：使用ASL-504 眼动记录仪，以16 名大学
生为被试，采用2（材料性质）×2（专业）的二因素被试间设计。结果：材料性质主效应不显著，但材料性质在相对注视时间、相对注
视次数和瞳孔直径上呈现显著差异；专业因素主效应显著，专业因素在平均注视时间和平均眼跳距离上差异显著，二因素交互作
用不显著；" 如果子句" 和" 那么子句" 在所有眼动指标上不存在显著差异。结论：（1）抽象程度高的材料在理解四卡片问题时需
要更多的加工，包括条件句及其组成部分；（2）不同专业背景对理解条件句有不同的影响；（3）条件句各组成部分在理解时得到同
等重要的加工。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: To examine the influence of data category and specialty on four-card problem. Methods: Using ASL 504
Eye-tracking system, 16 undergraduates attended the experiment of a between-group design, which was 2 (data category: abstract or concrete)
×2 ( specialty: arts or science). Results: ① There was no significance on main effect of data category while considered the great
standard, such as gaze time. ② There was of significance on main effect of specialty while considered the major standard. ③ There was
no significant difference between two inclusive parts of conditional statement. Conclusion: ① The four-card problem of abstract data
needed more cognitive process, including condition statement and its inclusive parts. ② Different specialty of subjects had different effect
on comprehension of four-card problem. ③ There had been comparably processed between two inclusive parts of conditional statement. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
