Article Summary
吴 静,姜 惠,王 丽,束燕雯,孙 璐.沙格列汀与达格列净分别联合阿法骨化醇对T2DM性骨质疏松症患者疗效和25-羟维生素D水平,骨代谢指标的影响[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2025,(3):468-473.
沙格列汀与达格列净分别联合阿法骨化醇对T2DM性骨质疏松症患者疗效和25-羟维生素D水平,骨代谢指标的影响
The Efficacy of Saxagliptin and Dapagliflozin Combined with Alfacalcidol in Patients with T2DM Induced Osteoporosis and Their Effects on 25 Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Bone Metabolism Indicators
Received:November 21, 2024  
DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2025.03.009
中文关键词: 沙格列汀  达格列净  阿法骨化醇  T2DM  骨质疏松症  疗效  25(OH)D  骨代谢指标
英文关键词: Saxagliptin  Dapagliflozin  Alfacalcitriol  T2DM  Osteoporosis  Therapeutic effect  25(OH)D  Bone metabolism indicators
基金项目:江苏省老年健康科研项目(LKM2022081);镇江市科技计划项目(SH2022045); 镇江市重点研发计划(社会发展)项目(FZ2022092)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
吴 静 江苏大学附属人民医院内分泌科 江苏 镇江 212002 15862973015@163.com 
姜 惠 江苏大学附属人民医院内分泌科 江苏 镇江 212002  
王 丽 江苏大学附属人民医院内分泌科 江苏 镇江 212002  
束燕雯 江苏大学附属人民医院内分泌科 江苏 镇江 212002  
孙 璐 江苏大学附属人民医院内分泌科 江苏 镇江 212002  
Hits: 4
Download times: 1
中文摘要:
      摘要 目的:对比研究沙格列汀与达格列净分别联合阿法骨化醇对T2DM性骨质疏松症(DOP)患者疗效、25-羟维生素D[25(OH)D]及骨代谢指标的影响。方法:选入2021.4~2024.4收治的DOP患者84例,分为沙格列汀组(42例)和达格列净组(42例),两组均联合阿法骨化醇治疗。比较临床疗效、25(OH)D水平及骨代谢指标。结果:(1)两组治疗后FPG、2hPG、HbA1c降低(P<0.05),组间比较无差异(P>0.05)。(2)两组治疗后BMD、血清25(OH)D和OC升高,PINP降低(P<0.05),而沙格列汀组升高/降低幅度明显大于达格列净组(P<0.05);(3)沙格列汀组治疗总有效率显著高于达格列净组(95.24% vs. 76.19%,P<0.05)。(4)两组均未见明显不良反应。结论:沙格列汀与达格列净均可有效控制血糖水平,而前者在增加BMD、改善骨代谢指标、提高DOP整体疗法方面更具优势。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the therapeutic effects of saxagliptin and dapagliflozin combined with alfacalcidol on patients with type 2 diabetes induced osteoporosis (DOP), as well as their effects on 25 hydroxyvitamin D [25 (OH) D] and bone metabolism indicators. Methods: 84 DOP patients admitted from 2021.4 to 2024.4 were divided into saxagliptin (42) and dagliflozin (42). Both groups were combined with alfacaxiol. Clinical efficacy, 25 (OH) D level, and bone metabolism parameters were compared. Results: (1) FPG, 2 hPG, and HbA 1 c decreased after the two treatment groups (P<0.05), and there was no difference between the groups (P>0.05). (2) BMD, serum 25 (OH) D and OC increased, and PINP decreased (P<0.05), while the increase / decrease in saxagliptin group was greater than that in dagagliflozin group (P<0.05); (3) The total effective rate of the saxagliptin group was significantly higher than that of the dapagliflozin group (95.24% vs. 76.19%, P<0.05). (4) No significant adverse reactions were observed in both groups. Conclusion: Both saxagliptin and dapagliflozin can effectively control blood glucose levels, with the former having more advantages in increasing BMD, improving bone metabolism indicators, and enhancing overall DOP therapy.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close