| Objective: To construct a scientific and objective evaluation system for the popular science ability of pharmacists in traditional chinese medicine hospitals, accurately assess the popular science ability of pharmacists, and provide quantitative evaluation standards and improvement directions for the popular science work of hospital pharmacy. Method: Based on the actual popular science activities of pharmacists in the Pharmacy Department of Wuxi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from June 2023 to June 2024, relevant literatures on the evaluation index system of popular science ability in multiple fields were reviewed, to construct an evaluation index system of pharmacy popular science ability, which includes four secondary dimensions: talent team, platform construction, popular science works and popular science activities, and 16 tertiary indicators. By using entropy weight method, the original data was first subjected to range standardization processing to eliminate dimensional differences, and the information entropy of each index was calculated to determine the weights and reduce the subjective judgment deviation. By using TOPSIS method, to construct a weighted standardized matrix, determine the ideal solution and the negative ideal solution, calculate the euclidean distance and relative proximity of each pharmacist to the ideal solution, and achieve the quantitative ranking of the popular science ability of pharmacists. Result: The evaluation system for the popular science ability of pharmacists in traditional chinese medicine hospitals was successfully constructed. The evaluation results show that, the pharmacy popular science ability of the pharmacist group as a whole shows an upward trend, but the individual differences were obvious. Some pharmacists perform outstandingly in terms of the update frequency of popular science content, the click-through rate of their works, and the satisfaction of the audience, while others have deficiencies in the scientific accuracy of popular science content and the number of audiences. Potential improvement factors include hospitals attaching greater importance to popular science in pharmacy, optimizing the allocation of popular science resources, and strengthening the cultivation of personal abilities of pharmacists, etc. Conclusion: This evaluation system is of great value in assessing the popular science ability of pharmacists in traditional Chinese medicine hospitals. It can provide a scientific basis for the improvement of pharmacists'' personal abilities, the allocation of popular science resources in hospitals, personnel training and strategy formulation. At the same time, it also provides a reference for the popular science work of pharmacists in other medical institutions. |
